.gif)
Listed below are eight problems Wayne Grudem finds with
theistic evolution. He may not be an authority on these matters, but in typical
fashion he distills the main points nicely and explain succinctly what
unbiblical conclusions we must reach for theistic evolution to be true.
1) Adam and Eve were not the first human beings, but
they were just two Neolithic farmers among about ten million other human beings
on earth at that time, and God just chose to reveal himself to them in a
personal way.
2) Those other human beings had already been seeking to
worship and serve God or gods in their own ways.
3) Adam was not specially formed by God of ‘dust from
the ground’ (Gen. 2:7) but had two human parents.
4) Eve was not directly made by God of a ‘rib that the
Lord God had taken from the man’ (Gen. 2:22), but she also had two human
parents.
5) Many human beings both then and now are not descended
from Adam and Eve.
6) Adam and Eve’s sin was not the first sin.
7) Human physical death had occurred for thousands of
years before Adam and Eve’s sin – it was part of the way living things had
always existed.
8) God did not impose any alteration in the natural
world when he cursed the ground because of Adam’s sin.
Additionally, here are a few questions theistic evolution raises for
the Bible believing Christian: How can we uphold the special dignity and
majesty the Bible accords human beings when we are only qualitatively different
from other life forms and continuous with the rest of the animal world? How can
God impute sin and guilt to all humans along the lines of federal headship when
some of us have no physical connection with Adam? Likewise, if we are not all
descended literally from one pair, how can we all have an ontological
connection with Christ who only assumed the flesh of Adam’s race?
(From Justin Taylor's "Between Two Worlds")
(From Justin Taylor's "Between Two Worlds")
